At the weekly tutorials, one of the students asked me what software they should use for their designs and which one is ‘good‘. I was left perplexed… I attempted to make an inttellligent suggestion as I perused my thoughts for programmes which I have used in the past and current. Rhinoceros+Grasshopper spit out through my lips and the reveberation were echoed to the ears of the students.
This left the student with other questions such:
- as is it going to help me get a job?
- Is it easy to learn?
- How long would it take for me to be proficient at using it?
Legible question I should add because when I was choosing to learning any software it was not because it will help me best explain the project. It was mainly to do with being employed once I have learned it. I think today an architecture studets is required to learn so many programmes that it’s even hard to figure out which one would best suit the industry standards. Autodesk are the one championing the BIM idea and other companies are buying to this idea. The profession seems to be enthralled with a degree of quasi softwarism that is emerging to direct how people should design and make things. This is a compilation that was conducted by someone on archdaily that a student allowed me to see it, that help the lost to indentify which software they are ought to use with regards to their design skills and interests-it fails to cover a lot of things.
My on learning new porgrammes thus far it seems to be oriented towards what the industry is requiring rather than me providing the knowledge of how I think and apply my design intution. I am more focused on learning to meet specific practice in order than they find work which is similar to their taste so that they can easily employ me- i think with most students this is what they are focused on. The prioritisation of learning software rather than the cultivation of new knowledge in light of emerging industry technologies.